THE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT OF ORGANIZATION ON AGILE METHODOLOGY

Authors

  • Saurabh M. tech. Research Scholar, Rohtak Institute of Engg. & Mgt. College
  • Savita Bishnoi Rohtak Institute of Engg. & Mgt. College

Keywords:

implemented, methodologies, adaptability, collaboration

Abstract

The basic requirement of Software development methodology is delivery, adaptation to requirements and feedback collection on required information. Agile software development is a group of software development methodologies that well promotes the development iterations, open collaboration, and process adaptability throughout the project. This paper includes performance analysis and comparison of agile methodology with traditional one. However, when some projects are implemented in a business environment, there is often a lack of well established
method of project management or skilled project implementers, so that methods can be used that were used in large organizations. A good project management method that can help with successful implementation could prove beneficial to many organizations of small and medium size. Agile project management has great potential to fill this role, and it was with this goal in mind that this research was conducted. This paper is a survey for all agile development methods and their comparison with simple software development methodologies. In this Paper there will be discussed about some agile methodology with respect to parameters of performance analysis and process estimation.

References

Agile Software Development methods-Review and analysis by Pekka Abrahamsson, Outi Salo, Jussi Ronkainen and Juhani Warsta.

Abrahamsson, P., Warsta, J., Siponen, M.T. and Ronkainen, J. New Directions on Agile Methods: A Comparative Analysis, Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003 (Oregon, USA).

L. Williams and A. Cockburn, ―Agile Software Development: It‘s about Feedback and Change,‖ IEEE Computer, June 2003, pp. 39-43

Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., & Mangalaraj, G. (2005). Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Communications of the ACM, 48(5), 72-78.

Manifesto for Agile software development;

http://agilealliance.com

Lindvall, M., Basili, V. R., Boehm, B., Costa, P., Dangle, K., Shull, F., Tesoriero, R.,Williams, L., & Zelkowitz, M. (2002). Empirical findings in agile methods. In Proceedings of Extreme Programming and Agile Methods – XP/Agile Universe Conference 2002, Chicago, IL, 97-207.

Agile software development: Evidence from the field. Alan MacCormackhttp://www.agile develop- pmentconference.com/2003/files/AlanAgileSoftwar eJun03.ppt

Boehm, B.W. Software Engineering Economics, 1981 (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey)

K. Peterson, A Comparison of Issues and Advantages in Agile and Incremental Development between State of the Art and an Industrial Case. Journal of System and Software. 2009

Boehm, B., Port, D., & Brown, A. W. (2002). Balancing plan-driven and agile methods in software engineering project courses. Computer Science Education,12(3), 187-195.

Meso, P., & Jain, R. (2006). Agile software development: adaptive systems principles and best practices. Information Systems Management, 23(3), 19-30.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2016

How to Cite

Saurabh, & Savita Bishnoi. (2016). THE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT OF ORGANIZATION ON AGILE METHODOLOGY. International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, 7(4). Retrieved from https://jrps.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/834

Issue

Section

Original Research Article