Scope of Modelling and Control of an FCC Unit

Authors

  • Neha Mtech Petroleum refining & petrochemicals student National Instute of Engineering and technology(NIET). =NIMS University Jaipur, Rajasthan
  • Amrita Singh Mtech Petroleum refining & petrochemicals student National Instute of Engineering and technology(NIET). =NIMS University Jaipur, Rajasthan

Keywords:

regenerator, dense bed, dilute bed, five lump kinetics

Abstract

Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) is an essential lprocess for the conversion of gas oil to gasoline. model uses three lump kinetics to describe the cracking reactions in the riser considered as a plug-flow system. The riser behavior is described by gasoil, gasoline, coke and energy balances as a plug flow reactor. The separator is considered as a CSTR. The regenerator mainly constituted by a dense and a dilute zone is also considered as a CSTR to represent the catalyst and its dynamic behavior is described by coke, oxygen and energy balances. This model is sufficiently complex to capture the major dynamic effects that occur in a FCC and to control the key variables which are the riser outlet temperature and the regenerator dense bed temperature. The manipulated inputs are the air inlet flow rate in the regenerator and the regenerated catalyst flow rate. Hard constraints are imposed with respect to the manipulated variables. In spite of the important nonlinearity of the FCC, Model Predictive Control is able to maintain a smooth multivariable control of the plant, while taking into account the constraints.

References

M.A. Fahim, T.A. Al-Sahhaf& A.S. Elkilani, “Fundamentals of Petroleum Refining,” 1st ed., 2010 (Elsevier).

Robert A. Meyers, “Handbook of Petroleum Refining Process,” 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill)

D. Kunii, O. Levenspiel, “Fluidization Engineering,” 2nd ed., 1991 (Butterworth–Heinemann, London).

Prabha K.Dasila et al, “Parametric Sensitivity Studies in a Commercial FCC Unit,” Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science, 2012, 2, 136-149.

MehranHeydari et al, “Study of Seven-Lump Kinetic Model inthe Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit,” American Journal of Applied Sciences,2010, 7 (1), 71-76.

K. K. Dagde, Y. T. Puyate, “ Modelling And Simulation Of Industrial FCC Unit: Analysis Based On Five-Lump Kinetic Scheme For Gas-Oil Cracking,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications , 2012, Vol. 2, Issue 5, 698-714.

Vijay Kumar Koratiya et al, “MODELING, SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF FCC DOWNER REACTOR,” Petroleum & Coal, 2010, 52(3), 183-192.

ArnonArbelet al, “Dynamics and Control of Fluidized Catalytic Crackers: 3. Designing the Control System: Choice of Manipulated and Measured Variables for Partial Control,”Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1996,35,2215-2233.

H.A. Affum et al, “ModelingConversion in a Fluid Catalytic Cracking Regenerator in Petroleum Refining,” Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 2011, 3(6), 533-539.

G.M. Bollas et al, “Integrated FCC riser—regenerator dynamics studied in a fluid catalytic cracking pilot plant,” Chemical Engineering Science, 2007,62, 1887 – 1904

Downloads

Published

30-06-2015

How to Cite

Neha, & Amrita Singh. (2015). Scope of Modelling and Control of an FCC Unit. International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, 6(2), 1–6. Retrieved from https://jrps.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/713

Issue

Section

Original Research Article