Nexus Between Corporate Social Responsibilities and Social Environment: Evidence from Premier Manufacturing Industries in Northern Odisha
Keywords:
Community empowerment, Ethical conduct, CSRAbstract
While the aspirations of CSR are noble, its execution is not without challenges. Balancing profit motives with societal obligations, ensuring accountability, and measuring the impact of CSR initiatives can prove intricate. However, corporations are progressively embracing innovative solutions to navigate these challenges. Robust reporting mechanisms, stakeholder engagement, and leveraging technology for transparent communication are among the strategies employed to overcome hurdles and maximize the positive impact of CSR. In the labyrinth of corporate social responsibility, no single definition can encapsulate its vast dimensions. Rather, CSR is an evolving concept that embodies the interplay between business and society, embracing ethical conduct, sustainable practices, and community upliftment. It is a commitment to holistic development, underpinned by the understanding that the prosperity of businesses and societies is intertwined. As businesses stride towards responsible citizenship, CSR stands as a beacon guiding them towards a future where profit and purpose coexist harmoniously. CSR, when executed with genuine intent, has the power to manifest a win-win scenario for both businesses and societies. As corporations invest in sustainable practices, ethical conduct, and community empowerment, they generate positive outcomes that reverberate across society. Communities thrive with improved infrastructure, education, and quality of life. Simultaneously, businesses reap rewards in the form of enhanced brand reputation, customer loyalty, and even potential cost savings through efficient resource utilization. This mutual benefit underscores the intrinsic harmony between corporate success and societal progress.
Key words: CSR, Community empowerment, Ethical conduct
References
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Kumar, V., & Lim, H. (2008). Does CSR lead to corporate reputation? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 385-401.
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2007). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management, 36(4), 3-27.
Aggarwal, P. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in India: A comparative analysis of top 100 companies. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(10), 150-156.
Momin, M. A., & Ghadially, R. (2016). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in India: A case study of the Tata Group. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 317-324.
Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Thornton, M. A., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2013). Applicants' and employees' reactions to corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of first-party justice perceptions and moral identity. Personnel Psychology, 66(4), 895-933.
Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Harvard Business School Press.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39(3), 254-280.
Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758-781.
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710.
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-243.
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139.
Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3-19.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-243.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Re-users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as the original work is properly credited.