A study of Intellectual property rights & corporate law: A complimentary each other

Authors

  • Vibhor Agrawal Research Scholar Department of Law
  • Prof. Dr. Rana Parveen Faculty Of Law- Shri Venkateshwara University Shri Venkateshwara University, Rajabpur, Nh-24, Venkateshwara Nagar, Gajraula, Uttar Pradesh 244236

Keywords:

Trust, Contract, Asymmetry, Collaboration

Abstract

When it comes to today's information-based global competition, businesses of all sizes, both big and little, are looking for ways to tap into external knowledge and resources. Knowledge has become a critical resource for innovation and competitiveness in the global network age, say academics and practitioners alike. For knowledge generation, trust, social capital, and intellectual property management have become more important. The topic of trust and intellectual property is seldom explored at the same time. In asymmetric R&D cooperation, the importance of trust and contracts is discussed in this work. Prior to delving into a case study involving a small company's partnership with a major, worldwide machinery and equipment provider, we conduct an overview of the most recent research on these roles in interfirm cooperation. Research and development collaborations need an in-depth knowledge of contracts and trust relations. Successful cooperation can't be guaranteed by contracts, but contracts may be used to foster mutual understanding and learning, as well as trust. On the topic of asymmetric R&D collaborations, we provide a few suggestions for managers on how to strike a balance between trust and contracting.

References

Arrow, K., 1974. Limits of Economic Organization. Norton, New York.

Bailey, W.J., Masson, R., Reside, R., 1998. Choosing successful technology development partners: a best-practice model. International Journal of Technology Management 1–2, 124–138.

Barney, J.B., Hansen, M.H., 1994. Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 15, 175–190.

Battenburg, R., Rabu, W., Sneijders, C., 2000. Contacts and contracts: temporal embeddedness and the contractual behavior of firms. ISCORE papers No. 107.

Blomquist, K., 1999. Asymmetric partnerships—Different characteristics and motivation of small and large technology firms, Telecom Business Research Center, Lappeenranta University of Technology, working paper 3, Lappeenranta.

Blomquist, K., 2002. Partnering in the dynamic environment: the role of trust in asymmetric technology partnership formation. Doctoral Thesis, Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis 122.

Blomqvist, K., Kyla¨heiko, K., Virolainen, V.-M., 2002. Filling a gap in traditional transaction cost economics: towards transaction benefitsbased analysis. International Journal of ProductionsEconomics 79, 1–14.

Bradach, J.L., Eccles, R.G., 1991. Price, authority and trust: from ideal types of plural forms in markets, hierarchies and networks. In:

Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levacic, R., Mitchell, J. (Eds.), The Coordination of Social Life. Sage Publications, London, pp. 277–292.

Bromiley, P., Cummings, L.L., 1992. Transactions costs in organizations with trust, discussion paper 128, Strategic Management Research Center, University of Minnesota.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2022

How to Cite

Vibhor Agrawal, & Prof. Dr. Rana Parveen. (2022). A study of Intellectual property rights & corporate law: A complimentary each other. International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, 13(4), 75–80. Retrieved from https://jrps.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/286

Issue

Section

Original Research Article