Performance Appraisal of Permanent Lok Adalat in Haryana: A  Comprehensive Analysis

Rahul Kadian; Rajesh Kumar Kundu

doi:10.36676/jrps.v15.i2.1411

Authors

Rahul Kadian Research Scholar, Department of Public Administration, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak (Haryana)
Rajesh Kumar Kundu Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak (Haryana)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36676/jrps.v15.i2.1411

Keywords:

Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA), Free Legal Aid, Legal Awareness, Judicial System

Abstract

This study aims to examine the implementation of Haryana Legal Services Authority (HALSA) provisions, evaluate the functioning of Lok Adalats, assess the effectiveness of mediation centers alongside PLAs, review the process for granting free legal aid, and analyze the challenges faced by Permanent Lok Adalats in Haryana. This study employs a multistage sampling approach, including structured interviews with stakeholders, open discussions, and observations for primary data collection, alongside secondary sources like annual reports and published studies. Quantitative tools such as averages and percentages, as well as qualitative content analysis, were used for data analysis, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of PLA performance. The study finds that awareness of HALSA provisions is primarily driven by print and social media, with moderate overall awareness among respondents. Beneficiaries are generally satisfied with HLSA services, although improvements in accessibility and responsiveness are needed. PLA proceedings are viewed positively regarding information clarity and timeliness, but challenges persist in transparency, communication, and the handling of personal details. The study highlights the need for better infrastructure, enhanced awareness, and support mechanisms to ensure equal access to justice and effective dispute resolution by PLAs in Haryana.

References

• Agrawal, R. (2015). The Role of Lok Adalats in Reducing Court Backlog. Journal of Legal Studies, 43(2), 155-172.

• Bhatia, R. (2017). User Satisfaction in Lok Adalats: An Empirical Study. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 63(1), 45-58.

• Bhatt, A. (2013). Implementing Six Sigma in Judicial Processes. International Journal of Law and Management, 55(1), 52-59.

• Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. MIT Press.

• Desai, A. (2014). Evaluating the Quality of Settlements in Lok Adalats. Journal of Indian Law and Society, 5(2), 89-110.

• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.

• Gafoor Abdul, K.A. (2002). The Concept of Permanent Lok Adalat and the Legal Services Authorities Amendment Act, 2002. 5SCC (Jour) 33.

• Genn, H. (1999). Paths to Justice: What People Do and Think About Going to Law. Hart Publishing.

• Government of Haryana (2022). Permanent Lok Adalat, Haryana State Legal Services, <http://hslsa.nic.in/Publications%20PDF/PLA.pdf>

• Government of India (2022). Permanent Lok Adalat for Utility Service. Available at http://delhicourts.nic.in/PLAPUS%20Broucher%202008.pdf,

• Government of India, Legal Service India. Permanent Lok Adalats: An Analysis. Retrieved from Legal Service India.

• Government of India, Ministry of Law and Justice. (1987). Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, section 22-C.

• Government of India, Ministry of Law and Justice. (1987). Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, section 22-D.

• Government of India, National Legal Services Authority (NALSA). (2018). NALSA Annual Report 2018. Retrieved from nalsa.gov.in.

• Government of India, National Legal Services Authority (NALSA). Annual Report 2018-19. Retrieved from nalsa.gov.in.

• Jain, M.P. (2002). Access to Justice in India: The Role of Lok Adalats. Journal of the Indian Law Institute.

• Jatinder Singh. (2023). Concept of Lok Adalat in India. Innovative Research Thoughts, 9(2), 54–58. Retrieved from https://irt.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/636

• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

• Asra Shifaya. k., & Dr. Kuldip Singh. (2021). An Analysis on Working Processor of Lok Adalat In India. Innovative Research Thoughts, 7(4), 139–148. Retrieved from https://irt.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/1075

• Karnataka State Legal Services Authority (2017). Annual Report. Retrieved from kslsa.kar.nic.in.

• Kumar, V. (2018). Sustainability of Agreements in Lok Adalats: An Analysis. Indian Journal of Law and Justice, 9(1), 76-94.

• Kavita. (2018). Lok Adalat - Improvement suggestions. Universal Research Reports, 5(3), 157–159. Retrieved from https://urr.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/669

• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.57.9.705

• Menon, N.R. Madhava. (2003). Comparative Analysis of ADR Mechanisms in India. Indian Law Review.

• Panchu, S. (2011). Alternative Dispute Resolution: Law and Practice. LexisNexis.

• Pande, P. S., Neuman, R. P., & Cavanagh, R. R. (2000). The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance. McGraw-Hill.

• Rao, M. (2016). Perceptions of Informality in Lok Adalats: A Double-Edged Sword. Indian Law Review, 2(1), 103-120.

• Rao, P.C., & Sheffield, W. (1997). Alternative Dispute Resolution: What it means and how it works? Universal Law Publishing.

• Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605

• Sampath, K. (2016). Mediation and Lok Adalats: A Boon to the Indian Judicial System. International Journal of Law and Legal Jurisprudence Studies.

• Sharma, S. (2015). Challenges in the Functioning of Lok Adalats. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 61(3), 398-412.

• Sharma, S.K. (2015). Challenges Facing Lok Adalats in India. Indian Journal of Public Administration.

• Singh, P., & Verma, K. (2016). Lok Adalats: Accessibility and Inclusiveness. Social Change, 46(4), 563-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004908571004000409

• Supreme Court of India. (2005). New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sabharathanam. Retrieved from Supreme Court Judgments.

• Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. Yale University Press.

• Upadhyay, D. (2022). Commentary on the Legal Services Authorities Act. Eastern Book Company.