STUDY OF BEAM COLUMN JOINTS

Authors

  • Piyush Research Scholar, Department of Civil, GITM, Jhajjar Haryana
  • Nitish Malik A.P. Department of Civil, GITM, Jhajjar Haryana

Keywords:

Beam-Column Joint, Brittle Failure, Concrete Grade

Abstract

A beam-column joint has to transfer the shear forces, bending moments and other related structural response parameters efficiently. The present paper aims at studying the behavior of beam-column junction based on variations in concrete grade at junction. To increase the load carrying capacity of a joint, a higher grade of concrete is used at a joint and also up to 1.5D in the direction of beam from face of column, to shift or relocate the plastic hinge from the interface towards the beam.
The different specimens were prepared in a T-shaped mould by changing the grade of concrete at beam-column joint and these samples were tested after 7 and 28 days. The use of M20 or M25 grade of concrete at joint and up to 1.5D (D is the depth of beam) of length of beam (M15 grade of concrete in rest of mould) increases the load carrying capacity approximately to about 20% when compared with M20 or M25 grade of concrete at junction and M15 grade in the remaining mould. The most important finding is that the use of higher grade of concrete at a joint and up to 1.5D of length of beam, shifts the failure away from the beam-column interface Thus, a beam hinging mechanism is achieved which is a ductile type of failure compared to beam-column brittle interface failure and there is approximately 15-30% increase in load carrying capacity, in comparison with higher concrete grade only at a joint core. This is a simple and efficient method of preventing the beam-column joint failure.

References

Pampanin S, Christopoulos C, Chin T H. Development and validation of a metallic haunch seismic retrofit solution for existing under-designed RC frame buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 2006 Sep; 35(14):1739–66.

Dalalbashi A, Ronagh E. Plastic hinge relocation in RC joints as an alternative method of retrofitting using FRP. Composite Structures. 2012 Jul; 94(8):2433–9.

Realfonzo R, Napoli A, Pinilla. Cyclic behavior of RC beam-column joints strengthened with FRP systems. Construction and Building Materials. 2014 Mar;54:282–97.

Esmaeeli E, Barros J, Cruz J, Fasan L, Prizzi F. Retrofitting of interior RC beam-column joints with CRPF strengthened SHCC: Cast-in-place solution. Composite Structures. 2015 Apr; 122:456–67.

Pampanin S, Calvi GM, Moratti M. Seismic behavior of RC beam-column joints designed for gravity loads. In: 12th European conference on earthquake engineering, London: Elsevier Science Ltd; 2002.

Hakuto S, Park R, Tanaka H. Seismic load tests on interior and exterior beam-column joints with substandard reinforcing details. ACI Structural Journal. 2000 Jan; 97(1):11–25.

Yilmaz N, Avsar O. Structural damages of the May 19, 2011 Kutahya-Simav earthquake in Turkey. Natural Hazards. 2013 Jun; 69(1):981–1001.

Yurdakul O, Avsar O. Strengthening of substandard reinforced concrete beam-column joints by external post-tension rods. Engineering Structures. 2016 Jan; 107:9–22.

El-Amoury T, Ghobarah A. Seismic rehabilitation of beam– column joint using GFRP sheets. Engineering Structures. 2002 Nov; 24(11):1397–407.

Beschi C, Meda A, Riva P. Column and joint retrofitting with studies high performance reinforced concrete jacketing.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 2011 Jun; 15(7):989–1014.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2020

How to Cite

Piyush, & Nitish Malik. (2020). STUDY OF BEAM COLUMN JOINTS. International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, 11(2), 41–50. Retrieved from https://jrps.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/1108

Issue

Section

Original Research Article