Humour, Subversion and Voice of a Subaltern: Reading “Truth Vow” as LeitMotif in Habib Tanvir’s Play Charandas Chor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36676/jrps.v15.i2Keywords:
Humour, Subversion, Truth Vow, Leitmotif, Voice, Indian TheatreAbstract
In the cultural and sociological context, “Truth” and “Vow” appear as crucial motifs in Indian myths, Vedas, and epics. Truth is believed to be a virtue and a vow is a solemn promise that we make in different social, cultural, political, and religious contexts, and a truth vow combidly becomes a virtuous promise. The most prominent example of a truth vow is used in court cases, where the witness proclaims that “solemnly I vow to speak only and only truth” in Indian law proceedings (no one can assure that it really happens but the court believes it so). Other examples of vowing include marriage communion, religious occasions, and constitutional and self-motivation. One such leitmotif of “Truth Vow” extrapolates the dramatic narrative of the play “Charandas Chor”(1975) written by playwright Habib Tanvir. The truth, as a leitmotif, ferments subversive humour for the spectator and reader of the play. Playwright Tanvir presented truth not only as a virtue but binds it with a vow, thus enlarging it as a characteristic trait of the Protagonist. This leitmotif becomes a subjugating tool and with this, the marginalised character locates his own voice in the end. Therefore, this paper discusses the role of “Truth Vow” as leitmotifs in the play “Charandas Chor” (1975) along with its humour and utterance. The play has previously been read as a social critic, for its folk elements, and its subaltern representation, but here, the aim is to read truth as a voice, which even when suppressed by the hegemonic powers, resists in its disappearance. Here, the method of textual analysis is used to evaluate the play. The text is read to locate instances of the truth and its positioning and to negotiate with masses subverting aspects.
References
Bhatia, N. (Ed.). (2009). Modern Indian Theatre: A Reader. Oxford University Press.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.; C. Gordon, Trans.). Pantheon Books.
Gray, J. M. (2010). Vows, Oaths, and the Propagation of a Subversive Discourse. The Sixteenth Century Journal, 41(3), 731-756.
Guha, R. (1999). Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India. Duke University Press.
Hansen, K. (1983). Indian Folk Traditions and the Modern Theatre'. Asian Folklore Studies, 42(1), 77-79.
Katyal, A. (2012). Habib Tanvir: Towards an Inclusive Theatre. SAGE Publications.
Malick, J. (2021). Diverse Pursuits: Essays on Drama and Theatre. Taylor & Francis Group.
Moore, G.E. (1899). The Nature of Judgment. Mind, 8(30), 176-93.
Paul, J. (Ed.). (September 1989). Contemporay Indian Theatre, Interviews with playwrights and DIrectors (R. Sodhi, Trans.). Sangeet Natak Akademi.
Rusell, B. (1903, 1937). The Principles of Mathematics. Allen and Unwin.
Rusell, B. (1992). Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description.
Sharma, S. (2023, January 1). Habib Tanvir's theatre — for the people, by the people. The Tribune. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/features/habib-tanvirs-theatre-%E2%80%94-for-the-people-by-the-people-468437
Tanvīr, H. (2004). Charandas Chor. Vāṇī Prakāśana.
Tell, D., & Agamben, G. (2012). The Sacrament of Language: An Archaeology of the Oath (A. Kotsko, Ed.). Philosophy & Rhetoric, 45(4), 452-459.
To be More Brechtian is to be More Indian. (2008). In Poetics, Plays, and Performances: The Politics of Modern Indian Theatre (pp. 210-228). Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Re-users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as the original work is properly credited.
